Apple’s Phil Schiller criticizes Android and its facial recognition

Apple’s famous executive and vice president of global marketing, Phil Schiller, recently criticized the performance of facial recognition on Android devices praising, who do you think, the iPhone X and its Face ID.

These statements were given to the well-known Bright site, in which He stated that his rivals, at least in this section, “suck” and that iPhones have no competition in this area, but are they really the prominent kings of facial recognition? Well, from here Androidsis, we will analyze how true this is.

It should be noted, first of all, that Phil Schiller is the executive vice president of worldwide marketing for the famous American company of the bitten apple. Well, taking this into account, it is to be expected that a character of this caliber does not speak ill of the phones that his company produces, rather, it is a somewhat patriotic comment to give dignity to his position.

In a statement, Phil Schiller said that the iPhone X is “the smartphone that dictates the next ten years”. That said, he was asked, “Does that apply to the entire industry or just Apple?”, to which he laughed, “Oh, I’m just thinking of us. If we pick the right things and they work as expected, they will end up influencing the entire industry. Because when we do things really well, others like to copy us.”

What’s more, claims that the current facial recognition of iPhones is much better than its old Touch ID: “Ultimately, what we’re doing there is making privacy security even easier to do, so we all want to do it,” Schiller says of the benefits of Face ID.

How to prevent an Android application from running in the background

He also claimed that, before Apple brought out its Face ID, facial and iris recognition from other smart devices, “they suck,” specifically saying, “They all suck.”

Huawei mocks Apple’s Face ID

In the past we have seen that companies like Huawei, made fun of its Face ID. Moreover, they practically trolled her, showing the “simplicity” of the facial recognition of the new iPhones and, at the same time, praising the Huawei Mate 10 with its powerful Kirin 970 processor powered by artificial intelligence.

The ad consists of a small video, of just over 10 seconds, in which we can see an animation of the clown emoji on a smartphone screen, supposedly from the iPhone X, which is mistakenly trying to unlock the device using the failed FaceID. The text that accompanies the video says, “Let’s face it, facial recognition is not for everyone. Unlock the future with #TheRealAIPhone. 10.16.2017”, pointing to the announcement that Huawei made to the Mate 10 and its other two variants on that date.

How good is the facial recognition of the iPhone X?

To be realistic, the facial recognition of the iPhone, the Face ID, is not bad at all, but, on the other hand, it is not a great thing, being critical.

The Face ID of the iPhone is not advanced enough, nor out of this world as Phil Schiller paints it. You still need the absence of scarves or accessories that change, in a certain way, the appearance of the face.

Even if if we talk about the technology on which this function is based, it must be admitted that it is very sophisticated. According to Apple, this makes perception of up to 30,000 invisible points of the face to be able to analyze, symmetrically and asymmetrically, the facial map, the infrared image obtained, and its depth.

Tips to be an Android app developer and live from it

A part of the neural engine of the A11 Bionic chip, which is the one that has the latest iPhones, protected in Secure Enclave, transforms the depth map and the infrared image into a mathematical representation and compares it with the corresponding facial data. In this way, if everything matches correctly, the device is automatically unlocked, or else it stays locked.

But well, according to the next video that you can see below, Apple technology will have to continue to be developed for true security and privacy.

Our conclusion agrees with that of the video: “iPhone X’s Face ID is not as secure as Apple has made it out to be.”